MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329456522 · doi:10.1021/jp209905g

Association and Microheterogeneity in Aqueous 2-Butoxyethanol Solutions

2011· article· en· W2329456522 on OpenAlexafffund
R. N. Gupta, G. N. Patey

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersWestern Canada Research GridCompute Canada
KeywordsAqueous solutionChemistryMicelleAggregation numberMole fractionDilutionHydrogen bondMoleculeIntramolecular forceHydrodynamic radiusSolventEtherNeutron scatteringRADIUSMonomerMolecular dynamicsChemical physicsThermodynamicsPhysical chemistryComputational chemistryScatteringCritical micelle concentrationOrganic chemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Molecular dynamics simulations are employed to investigate aggregation and microheterogeneity in dilute solutions of 2-butoxyethanol (BE) in water. The BE concentration is varied from near infinite dilution to the mole fraction X(BE) = 0.04. It was found that large systems (32,000 molecules) are necessary to accommodate the BE aggregates that form in this concentration range. Simulations were performed with two different force fields, and similar results were obtained. At very low concentration, BE aggregation is not observed, but evidence is found for intramolecular hydrogen bonds (between the hydroxyl hydrogen and the ether oxygen of the same BE molecule) that form five-member ring configurations, similar to those reported in experimental studies of BE in nonaqueous solvent. Initial signs of BE association appear at X(BE) ≈ 0.005, after which aggregation occurs rapidly, with aggregates that can be described as micelle-like being fully formed at X(BE) ≈ 0.02. This concentration agrees well with many experimental studies of aggregation in BE-water solutions. Between X(BE) = 0.02 and 0.04, the aggregates appear to grow a little in size, but the basic structure remains the same. At long range, the various pair correlation functions show clear density oscillations associated with BE aggregation. This allows us to identify the length scales of the existing microheterogeneity and to estimate the size of the BE aggregates. If we assume spherical aggregates, then our estimate of the radius at X(BE) = 0.04 (~42 Å) is close to estimates obtained from light scattering and small-angle neutron scattering experiments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.200

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicSpectroscopy and Quantum Chemical StudiesFrench-language works237,207