Shelf life of ground poultry meat stored under modified atmosphere
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The shelf life of ground chicken and turkey meat packaged under a modified atmosphere containing O2 and a high level of CO2 (62% CO2, 8% O2, and 30% N2; gas-1), or a gas mixture without O2 (20% CO2 and 80% N2; gas-2) was evaluated for 20 d at 1 C. Meat packaged under gas-2 maintained a higher a* value (redness) throughout the experiment and generally had a more appealing color than the meat packaged using gas-1. Microbial populations were assessed after 8, 12, and 15 d of storage. Total aerobic mesophilic counts were higher in chicken meat than in turkey throughout storage. Coliforms and Escherichia coli counts were lower in meat packaged under gas-1. After 15 d of storage at 1 C, Brochothrix thermosphacta was detected only in ground chicken meat packaged using gas-2. Meat packaged under the gas mixtures tested had similar counts for presumptive pseudomonads, Staphylococcus aureus, and lactic acid bacteria. These results indicate that an appropriate gas mixture can maintain a desirable color in ground poultry meat but offers no guarantees with respect to the microbial profile of meat.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".