MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Epigenomic and Gene Expression Changes in Testicular Cells From Exposure to Phthalates

2010· article· en· W2329504243 on OpenAlexaff
Bryan Nguyen, James Gomes

Bibliographic record

VenueEpidemiology · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics
TopicChemical Reactions and Isotopes
Canadian institutionsInstitute of Population and Public HealthUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDNA methylationEpigeneticsBiologyMethylationPhthalateGene silencingCancer researchTesticular Germ Cell TumorGeneTumor suppressor geneGene expressionRegulation of gene expressionTesticular cancerMolecular biologyGeneticsCarcinogenesisCancerChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PP-30-181 Background/Aims: Epigenetic changes disrupting the regulation of gene expression are a common process in the development of cancer. Testicular germ cell tumor (TGCT) is the most common malignancy in young males, and its incidence has been rising in recent years. Epigenetic mechanisms have been known to be associated with gene silencing in TGCT. DNA hypermethylation can cause gene silencing, including the inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. Many tumor suppressor genes have been found to be silenced in TGCT following DNA hypermethylation. Phthalates are endocrine disruptors and are abundantly used as industrial plasticizers. Di-2-(ethylhexyl) phthalate (DEHP) is the most common phthalate found in consumer products and has been reported to be associated with hypermethylation. After exposure, Di-2-(ethylhexyl) phthalate is rapidly hydrolyzed into its active form, mono-(2-ethylhexyl) phthalate (MEHP), a testicular toxicant. The purpose of this study is to examine gene promoter-region methylation in testicular cells and assess the relationship between exposure to phthalates and expression and methylation status of tumor suppressor genes: Testisin and RASSF1A. Alteration of gene expression of xenobiotic metabolizing enzymes is also known to be associated with TGCT, thus genes, such as GSTP1 and CYP1A2, will also be studied. Methods: Promoter hypermethylation and gene expression was examined for each genes in testicular germ cells exposed to MEHP in a dose- and time-dependent manner at concentrations of 10 nM, 1 μM, 10 μM, 100 μM, and 1 mM at 24-, 48,- 72-, and 96-hour points, respectively. The methylation status of the tumor suppressor genes Testisin, RASSF1A, and xenbiotic metabolizing enzyme genes: GSTP1 and CYP1A2 were assessed by methylation specific (MSP)-PCR and gene expression by qRT-PCR. Results: Exposures inversely increased cell proliferation, cell viability and methylation, and decreased gene expression. The results indicative of an association between DNA methylation and gene expression following exposure to phthalate will be presented and discussed. Conclusion: The findings of this study will allow for a better understanding of the role phthalates play in DNA methylation and the subsequent expression of methylated genes in testicular germ cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.108
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.316 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEpidemiologySame topicChemical Reactions and IsotopesFrench-language works237,207