MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329520709 · doi:10.1097/rlu.0b013e318203bcc6

Incidental Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma in a Patient Presenting With Graves' Hyperthyroidism and Concomitant Obstructive Sequestered Intrathoracic Multinodular Goiter

2011· article· en· W2329520709 on OpenAlexaff
Anthony Ciarallo, William Makis, Javier-A. Novales-Diaz

Bibliographic record

VenueClinical Nuclear Medicine · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityRoyal Victoria Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineThyroidGoiterScintigraphyConcomitantThyroid carcinomaPathologyThyroidectomyNodule (geology)Graves' diseaseMediastinumMultinodular goitreRadiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A previously healthy 27-year-old woman presented with a thyroid goiter, symptoms of thyrotoxicosis, and mild respiratory obstruction. The serum thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH) was suppressed, serum T4 was elevated, and 24-hour radioiodine uptake was elevated at 59%. Thyroid scintigraphy showed intense uptake in an enlarged gland, with a cold nodule on the right, and a large isolated mass in the mediastinum, with very mild uptake. Total thyroidectomy and excision of the mediastinal mass revealed multiple pathologies: Graves disease in the thyroid gland with an incidental papillary thyroid carcinoma, and a benign sequestered intrathoracic multinodular goiter. Thyroid carcinoma can develop in a gland affected by Graves disease, however, the presence of concomitant sequestered intrathoracic thyroid tissue unaffected by Graves disease is highly unusual and has not been previously described. We present the scintigraphic findings, and several theories that could help explain these findings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0050.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.303
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueClinical Nuclear MedicineSame topicThyroid Cancer Diagnosis and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207