MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2329522542 · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.sabcs-2025

The pattern of metastatic spread among breast cancer sub-types.

2009· article· en· W2329522542 on OpenAlexaff
H. Kennecke, Rinat Yerushalmi, Ryan Woods, Maggie C.U. Cheang, David Voduc, Caroline Speers, Torsten O. Nielsen, Karen A. Gelmon

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies
Canadian institutionsBC Cancer Agency
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBreast cancerMedicineMetastatic breast cancerMetastasisCancerOncologyInternal medicineBasal (medicine)Stage (stratigraphy)CA15-3PathologyBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract #2025 Background: Although breast cancer subtypes are associated with differing relapse risks, the patterns of metastatic spread are less well defined, particularly for more than the first site of metastasis. We describe the sites of all diagnosed metastases among breast cancer subtypes in a large series of women diagnosed with breast cancer to further define patterns of spread. Methods: Subjects with early stage breast cancer referred to the British Columbia Cancer Agency from 1986 to 1992 were included. Archival paraffin tissue blocks were used to construct a tissue microarray. Breast cancer subtypes were defined as Luminal A (ER/PR+ and HER2- and Ki67 <19%), Luminal B (ER/PR+, and HER2- and Ki67 >19%), LuminalHer2 (Her2+ and ER/PR+), HER2 (HER2+ and ER- and PR-), and Basal (HER2-ER-PR- and CK 5/6+and/orEGFR+). All documented sites of distant metastasis were abstracted by chart review according to predefined categories. Results: 3526 eligible women were classified according to Luminal A (2109), Luminal B (514), LuminalHER2 (252), HER2 (276) and Basal (375) and 30%,47%, 48%, 50% and 42% in each subgroup were diagnosed with distant metastasis. Median Survival with metastatic disease was 2.2, 1.6 and 1.3 years in Luminal A, B and LuminalHER2 groups and 0.7 and 0.5 years in the HER2 and Basal types, respectively. Bone was the predominant site of metastasis for luminal groups A (76%), B (73%) and LuminalHER2 (70%). The distribution was more heterogeneous in HER and Basal groups. High rates of brain metastasis were observed in the HER2 (30%) and Basal (27%) and less frequently in the LuminalHER2 (17%) and other groups (p <0001). Conclusion: Molecular breast cancer subtypes are associated with specific distributions of metastasis which may lead to specific prophylactic therapies to modify this risk. New systemic therapies, including trastuzumab, may impact these patterns and survival after recurrence. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2009;69(2 Suppl):Abstract nr 2025.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.374
Teacher spread0.339 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicBreast Cancer Treatment Studies→French-language works237,207→