MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Effect of Creep Relaxation on the Delayed Hydride Cracking Behavior of Irradiated Zirconium 2.5%Wt Niobium Pressure Tube Material

2006· article· en· W2329529520 on OpenAlexaff
Heather Chaput, Brian W. Leitch, Don R. Metzger

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicNuclear Materials and Properties
Canadian institutionsAtomic Energy (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCreepMaterials scienceStress relaxationStress (linguistics)Zirconium alloyHydrideCrackingZirconiumHydrogenPressure vesselNiobiumComposite materialMetallurgyNuclear engineeringChemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Surface scratches and flaws encountered in CANDU nuclear pressure tubes must be evaluated to ensure that a cracking mechanism, called delayed hydride cracking (DHC), is not initiated. The stress concentration due to a flaw can cause diffusion of hydrogen and precipitation of zirconium hydride at the flaw tip. The presence of a hydride results in reduced fracture resistance in a local region where high stress prevails. In many cases, flaws exist for an extended period of time before the hydrogen content in the base material is sufficient to form a hydride. In this situation high stress creep can significantly relax the local stress at the flaw tip. The assessment of flaws on the basis of local stress distribution not considering creep is expected to be overly conservative, and may result in unnecessary remedial action in reactor operation and maintenance procedures. An experimental program has been developed to isolate and quantify the effect of creep on DHC in irradiated Zr-2.5%Nb pressure tube material. As part of this program, the thermal and load histories relevant to reactor operating conditions have been considered, and initial experimental results indicate that the action of creep increases the threshold load for crack initiation. Finite element analysis of creep relaxation around a hydride also supports the experimental results, and a fracture initiation model is applied to the experimental conditions in order to establish an analytical trend for the effect of creep. The quantitative effect predicted by the model is in reasonable agreement with the experimental results, and an improved, less conservative assessment procedure that accounts for creep is deemed to be practical.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.997

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNuclear Materials and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207