MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329562062 · doi:10.1190/segam2015-5909921.1

Time-lapse three-dimensional electromagnetic inversion of growth-impeded SAGD steam chambers

2015· article· en· W2329562062 on OpenAlexaff
Sarah G. R. Devriese, Douglas W. Oldenburg

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeophysical and Geoelectrical Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInversion (geology)Oil sandsSteam injectionGeologyOil fieldPetroleum engineeringElectrical resistivity and conductivityTransmitterElectromagnetic fieldElectromagnetic inductionSeismologyEngineeringElectrical engineeringPhysicsArchaeologyElectromagnetic coil

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary Heterogeneity in the Athabasca oil sands can impede the growth of SAGD steam chambers. Here, we show how controlled-source electromagnetic (EM) methods can be used to detect growth-impeded regions and monitor changes in steam chamber growth. Our achievements are two-fold. We first generate a background resistivity model based on well logging at a field site in the Athabasca oil sands and then estimate the resistivity of the steam chambers using an empirical formulation that incorporates the effects of temperature on the surrounding rocks. Using the resulting 3D model, electromagnetic responses for any EM survey can be computed. The second, and more important, achievement illustrates that imaging SAGD chambers, as they grow in time, may be possible with cost-effective surveys. Our example uses a single transmitter loop with receivers in observation wells. In the wells, only the vertical component of the electric field is measured. Even with this limited data set, the images obtained through 3D cascaded time-lapse inversion identifies the location and extent of an impeded steam chamber. The proposed EM survey acquisition time and processing should be relatively fast and cost-effective, and are expected to yield sufficient information to help make informed decisions regarding SAGD operations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.773
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGeophysical and Geoelectrical MethodsFrench-language works237,207