MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329583555 · doi:10.1093/res/hgr142

Marvell's 'Maniban' in Manuscript

2012· article· en· W2329583555 on OpenAlex
Nicholas von Maltzahn, R. E. S. Tanner

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Review of English Studies · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLibrary scienceHistoryClassicsArt historyArtComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The discovery of a manuscript of Marvell's Latin poem on the abbé Maniban sheds light on the text and context of that work. As well as offering separate witness to Marvell's poem, the manuscript ‘Grammatomantis’ provides a rare example of the circulation of his poetry other than his satires on affairs of state. It also helps settle an old conjecture about what occasion invited Marvell's writing and sending these elegiac distichs to his favourite nephew, William Popple, in Bordeaux. The poem reveals habits of voice and imagination characteristic of Marvell. His lasting concern about inquisitorial persecution finds expression, making the work something of a companion piece for the comparable Latin elegiac distichs in ‘Scævola Scoto-Brittannus’. The anticlerical impulse of ‘Grammatomantis’ is in keeping with other of Marvell's writings in the 1670s.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.245
Threshold uncertainty score0.676

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.056
GPT teacher head0.356
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it