MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329586008 · doi:10.5465/ambpp.2008.33725185

WHAT DOESN'T KILL YOU MAKES YOU STRONGER --DE NOVO ENTRY IN CLUSTERS.

2008· article· en· W2329586008 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Aviad Pe’er, Thomas Keil

Bibliographic record

VenueAcademy of Management Proceedings · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFirm Innovation and Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCompetition (biology)ProductivityCluster (spacecraft)Economic geographyResource (disambiguation)Biological dispersalContradictionBarriers to entryManufacturing sectorEconomicsIndustrial organizationBusinessLabour economicsBiologyEconomic growthEcologyDemographySociologyComputer scienceMarket structure

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Research on de novo firms' entry into clusters has produced puzzling results. Studies find that the likelihood of failure is higher yet the performance of survivors is higher than in dispersed locations. In this paper we are addressing this seeming contradiction by opening up some of the processes that take place during the initial stages of the life of a firm in cluster and dispersal locations. Using a novel dataset covering all de novo entrants into the Canadian manufacturing sector during 1984-1998, we show that clusters attract entrants with different resource endowments. Fierce competition in clusters screens out weaker entrants early while survivors exhibit improved productivity due to greater learning opportunities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.142
Threshold uncertainty score0.283

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAcademy of Management ProceedingsSame topicFirm Innovation and GrowthFrench-language works237,207