Chronic infection of a Brindley sacral nerve root stimulator
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Finetech-Brindley sacral anterior root stimulator (SARS) is implanted for the treatment of bladder dysfunction following spinal cord injury (SCI) and has been successful in improving micturition in many patients with SCI. This case describes a 62-year-old man who presented with a chronic Staphylococcus aureus infection of a Brindley SARS 26 years after implantation following a T5 American Spinal Injury Association A spinal cord injury (T5 ASIA A SCI). He presented with chronic sacral osteomyelitis with a history of periodic implant erosion through the skin. Following a series of interventions, definitive management involved removal of the intradural electrodes and epidural and intradural phlegmon, ligation of the thecal sac and flap reconstruction. In the case of delayed infection of a Brindley SARS, removal of the entire system should be considered, especially if extension of the infection to the intradural compartment is suspected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".