Pattern-Search-Based Nonconvex Cooperative Sensing in Multiband Cognitive Radio Systems
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, a pattern search (PS)-based solution is proposed for nonconvex multiband cooperative sensing (NCMCS) problem in cognitive radio systems. This problem consists of maximizing cumulative throughput subject to constraints on cumulative interference, probability of detection, and probability of false alarm. Initially in existing literature, this problem was solved under constraints that make it convex. However, removing the conditions for convexity and solving the NCMCS problem have been shown to improve performance. A two-step PS-based solution is presented: The first step uses uniformly distributed random sets of input points to find a solution. The set of points that gives the maximum throughput is chosen as input to the PS algorithm. Numerical examples show the improvement of the proposed method over existing genetic-algorithm-based solution, as well as PS-algorithm-based solution that uses a single set of random points as inputs. The proposed two-step solution gives higher cumulative throughput and is not sensitive to the choice of input, unlike the PS-based solution using a single set of random points as input.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it