MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329737160 · doi:10.2749/222137815818358862

Accelerated Bridge Construction using Ceramic Concrete Slabs

2015· article· en· W2329737160 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueReport · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMagnesium Oxide Properties and Applications
Canadian institutionsRead Jones Christoffersen (Canada)University of British ColumbiaUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPrecast concreteMaterials scienceSlabFabricationCrackingCeramicComposite materialBendingCementPortland cementStructural engineeringCompressive strengthStiffnessTension (geology)Ultimate tensile strengthEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>Recent adoption of Accelerated Bridge Construction approaches have typically focussed on intensive pre- fabrication of reinforced concrete components using traditional construction materials and techniques, later joining the components in place after erection. To further optimize this construction approach, there exists a strong need to use alternative construction materials that can both simplify and enhance the efficiency of the pre-fabrication and joining processes. Phosphate cement binders used in ceramic concrete have long been recognized for their rapid strength gain, excellent dimensional stability and superior ability to chemically bond across construction cold joints compared to concretes produced with Ordinary Portland Cement binders. To this aim, laboratory studies were completed to examine the feasibility of utilizing ceramic concretes produced with phosphate cement binders for full- and partial-depth precast bridge deck slab applications. Six slab strips were fabricated and tested with similar overall dimensions but which varied according to their layered slab composition and the fabrication techniques. Specimens had cross-section dimensions of 200 x 150 mm high and were tested in 4-point bending over a span of 1800 mm. Compressive strengths of the ceramic concrete ranged from 23 to 43 MPa. Reinforcement included conventional deformed steel bars and, in some cases, glass textile fabrics near the tension face intended to better control surface cracking. The primary interest in the test program was to study the stiffness, strength and cracking behaviour of the slab strips. The results demonstrated that specimens cast in layers with intentional inter-layer cold joints had similar performance to those cast monolithically, but splitting cracks were observed along interfaces between fiber-reinforced and non-fiber reinforced concrete layers at higher shear stresses due to the reinforcement configuration and the multi-layer casting. Further study of the structural response of the slabs was completed using a developed analytical model that directly incorporated the mechanical properties of the material obtained through testing. The cross-section response and full-member flexural response predicted by the model were in good agreement with the test specimen results for the parameters studied. Overall, the tests confirm the viability of the proposed prefabricated ceramic concrete slabs for use as part of an Accelerated Bridge Construction system.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.059
Threshold uncertainty score0.329

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.124
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it