P1-S2.31 Mean streets vs main street - more street youth report STIs, multiple sexual partners and lower condom use compared to their peers in the general population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background The burden of sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and engagement in high risk behaviours is assumed to be greater in street-involved youth (SIY) than the general population, but the magnitude of this difference has rarely been described. Methods Preliminary data from four sites (n=734) of E-SYS cycle 6 (Enhanced Surveillance of Street Youth, 2009-present) and the corresponding metropolitan centres of CCHS 2009 (Canadian Community Health Survey) were analysed. E-SYS is a repeated cross-sectional study of SIY (15–24 years), who completed an interviewer-administered questionnaire and provided blood and urine samples for STI, HIV and HCV testing. CCHS is a representative cross-sectional over the phone survey of Canadians, which collects data on health determinants and status. The CCHS sample was restricted to youth aged 15–24 years (weighted n=708 589, unweighted n=780). Estimates of self-reported STIs, sexual behaviours, substance use and demographics are reported with 95% CIs and IQRs. Results Compared to their peers in the general population, a greater proportion of SIY were male, between 15 and 19 years old, Aboriginal, Canadian-born, without a high school diploma and have higher rates of regular binge drinking, smoking and illicit drug use (Abstract P1-S2.31 table 1). A greater proportion of SIY (23.8% vs 3.5%) reported sexualities other than straight/heterosexual. A higher proportion of SIY had had sexual intercourse (95.5% vs 67.4%) and had been diagnosed with an STI (18.7% vs 3.8%). Sexually active SIY reported a lower proportion of condom use at last intercourse (35.4% vs 52.3%). The median age at first intercourse was 14 years among SIY and 17 years among youth in the general population. The median number of sexual partners for youth in the general population was one (last 12 months) compared to two partners for SIY (last 3 months). Abstract P1-S2.31 Table 1 Demographics, use of illicit drugs and alcohol, and sexual behaviours among youth aged 15–24 years who took part in Canadian Community Health Survey 2009 (CCHS) and Enhanced Surveillance of Street Youth (E-SYS) cycle 6. CCHS 2009 (Percentage, 95% CI E-SYS Cycle 6 (Percentage, 95% CI) Demographics Males 52.81 (52.69 to 52.93) 63.39 (59.78 to 66.88) Age 15–19 years 38.67 (38.26 to 38.49) 56.87 (53.27 to 60.47) Aboriginal 6.22 (6.16 to6.28) 41.55 (37.99 to 45.12) Born in Canada 75.47 (75.37 to 75.57) 93.44 (91.65 to 95.24) High School Completion* 93.87 (93.82 to 93.92) 25.81 (21.69 to 29.92) Drugs and Alcohol Binge Drink Regularly† 10.57 (10.50 to 10.65) 34.65 (31.15 to 38.15) Smoke Daily 11.86 (11.65 to 11.80) 76.13 (73.23 to 79.18) Illicit Drug use Last 12P1-S2.07 months‡ 24.86 (24.77 to 24.95) 94.28 (92.34 to 95.85) Sexual Behaviours Sexuality - “Straight” or “Heterosexual” 96.57 (96.54 to 96.60) 76.16 (73.08 to 79.24) Ever Had Intercourse 60.84 (60.72 to 60.95 95.5 (94.01 to 97.00) Age First Intercourse (Median, IQR in Years) § 17 (16 to 18) 14 (13 to 16) Condom Use Last Intercourse§ 52.34 (52.24 to 52.45) 35.42 (40.14 to 47.32) Number of partners (Median, IQR)§,¶ 1 (1 to 2) 2 (1 to 3) Ever had an STI§ 3.83 (3.79 to 3.87) 18.74 (15.91 to 21.57) Note - Preliminary data analysis only comes four E-SYS sites and corresponding census metropolitan areas from CCHS. * Among those aged 19 and over. † Binge drinking more than once a week. ‡ Excludes using cannabis once. § Asked from only those who indicated having had sexual intercourse. ¶ Last 3 months for ESYS, Last 12 months for CCHS. Conclusions Street-involved youth are more vulnerable to the social determinants of health, which partly explains the marked differences between them and their peers in the general Canadian population. Lower levels of education and other structural factors, combined with higher levels of substance use and riskier sexual practices may contribute to the higher burden of STIs among SIY. The magnitude of differences between the two groups highlights the need for continued efforts using a multi-sectoral approach to address the needs of this population though targeted interventions and programs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".