Microstructural Modeling and Effective Properties of Infiltrated SOFC Electrodes
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A modeling framework for the microstructural modeling of infiltrated SOFC electrodes is presented. The model numerically reconstructs infiltrated electrodes through a sedimentation algorithm for the backbone generation and a novel Monte Carlo packing algorithm for the random infiltration. Effective properties are evaluated by means of Monte Carlo geometric analysis and finite volume method as a function of the loading and of the particle size of infiltrated particles. Infiltration into ion-conducting and composite backbones is analyzed in this study. Simulations show that the infiltration can lead to an increase in TPB density of about two orders of magnitude if compared with conventional composite electrodes. In addition, infiltration into monocomponent backbones can lead to a TPB density about twice the TPB achievable when infiltrating composite backbones. On the other hand, a critical loading of nanoparticles must be reached in monocomponent backbones while in a composite backbone the infiltration is always beneficial.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it