Bibliographic record
Abstract
从猪流感疑似病例中分离鉴定猪流感病毒,并对病毒进行全基因组测序及其序列的分析。采用鼻棉拭子法从猪流感疑似病猪的鼻中收集病样,制成病毒悬液,经SPF鸡胚增殖培养和纯化。采用红细胞凝集、血凝抑制和神经氨酸酶抑制试验进行病毒亚型的判定,并作电镜观察。运用RT-PCR法扩增病毒的8个基因片段,分别克隆到pMD18-T载体,进行全基因组测序及序列分析。结果表明,获得1株猪流感病毒,经血凝、血凝抑制和神经氨酸酶抑制试验,判定为H3N2亚型,命名为A/swine/Chongqing/CQ/3/2011(H3N2),简称SIV CQ3。基因组序列比较分析显示,SIV CQ3 8个节段与不同时间的猪流感广东分离株(H3N2亚型)相应基因的核苷酸相似性最高,可能来源于H3N2亚型SIV。然而NP、HA和NA基因编码氨基酸序列与参考毒株A/New York/392/2004(H3N2)的相似性比较低,分别达95%、89%和90%;而血凝素(HA)裂解位点处的氨基酸序列为P-E-K-Q-T-R↓G,与参考毒株的一致,不具有高致病分子特征。此外,HA和NA的糖基化位点、受体结合位点处氨基酸存在一定程度的差异。最后,系统进化树分析显示NP、HA基因位于SIV群,与A/swine/Guangdong/2006/(H3N2)处于同一分支;而NA基因与禽流感(A/duck/Ontario/2000/AJ697881)和猪流感位于同一个进化单元,表明这株H3N2亚型流感病毒在不断的发生演变。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".