Solvent Effects on Kinetics of 2-Hydroxyethyl Methacrylate Semibatch Radical Copolymerization
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Radical copolymerizations of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) with n -butyl methacrylate (BMA) and n -butyl acrylate (BA) were carried out in xylene, DMF, and n -butanol solutions. Solvent effects on copolymerization propagation kinetics were investigated using pulsed laser polymerization (PLP) combined with size exclusion chromatography (SEC) as well as proton NMR, while starved-feed higher temperature semibatch reactions were carried out in different solutions to simulate industrial production. Solvent choice, through its influence on hydrogen bonding of HEMA monomer, has a significant impact on the copolymer composition and propagation rate coefficient and thus influences the semibatch polymerization behavior of BMA/HEMA, as previously found for the styrene/HEMA system. The presence of HEMA leads to increased polymer molecular weight, a result attributed to branching reactions involving dimethacrylate impurity. Although H-bonding (and solvent choice) influences BA/HEMA kinetics, its relative effect is negligible on semibatch operation under the conditions studied.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".