FIBRIN SEALANT IN THE TREATMENT OF RETINAL DETACHMENT IN MORNING GLORY SYNDROME
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: To report the usage of fibrin sealant in the treatment of retinal detachment in morning glory syndrome. METHODS: A case report of an 8-year-old boy with a recent, macula-off, inferior, bullous retinal detachment associated to his morning glory syndrome that was first treated by a pneumatic retinopexy. The following day, his examination revealed a total retinal detachment and subretinal gas. The patient underwent a 25-gauge pars plana vitrectomy, incomplete peeling of the glial tuft, 360° laser photocoagulation around the peripapillary staphyloma, 20% perfluoropropane endotamponade, and fibrin sealant injection to temporarily plug the slitlike retinal break visualized on the inferior border of the peripapillary staphyloma. RESULTS: Complete reattachment of the retina persisted after 6 months of follow-up with slight improvement in visual acuity noted by the patient. CONCLUSION: The authors believe that the usage of fibrin sealant seems to be a useful alternative in cases of retinal detachment related to morning glory syndrome with deep posterior peripapillary staphyloma, especially when persistent residual traction is suspected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".