MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329941179 · doi:10.14740/jcgo.v5i1.386

Notching in the Umbilical Artery Doppler Waveform in the Absence of Cord and Placental Structural Abnormalities: A Case of Massive Fetomaternal Hemorrhage

2016· article· en· W2329941179 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mai Nishimura, Ayaka Nakashima, Kayoko Shikado, Kazuhide Ogita

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBlood groups and transfusion
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineUmbilical arteryNotchingFetusCardiologyFetal distressUmbilical cordObstetricsRh IsoimmunizationInternal medicineAnesthesiaPregnancyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Massive fetomaternal hemorrhage can cause severe anemia and fetal death. Early diagnosis and blood transfusion can prevent life-threatening events. We describe a case of massive fetomaternal hemorrhage in a previously well primigravida who visited our hospital with a chief complaint of decreased fetal movements and presented with a sinusoidal fetal heart rate pattern in the cardiotocographic tracings. The umbilical artery Doppler waveform showed notching, and the peak systolic velocity of the fetal middle cerebral artery (MCA) was normal. Emergency cesarean section was performed; however, the neonate died despite providing life-support. Thus, we recommend consideration of impending fetal death in patients with non-reassuring fetal heart rate and notching in the umbilical artery Doppler waveform even in the absence of increased peak systolic velocity of the fetal MCA. J Clin Gynecol Obstet. 2016;5(1):50-52 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.14740/jcgo386w

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.310 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Clinical Gynecology and ObstetricsSame topicBlood groups and transfusionFrench-language works237,207