MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329964107 · doi:10.1097/wnr.0b013e3282ef6a29

Relationship between P50 suppression and the cortical silent period

2007· article· en· W2329964107 on OpenAlexaff
Bertram Möller, Gregory A. Light, Paul B. Fitzgerald, Joel S. Snyder, Robert Chen, Zafiris J. Daskalakis

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuroreport · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldNeuroscience
TopicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Western HospitalUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeurosciencePeriod (music)PsychologyCentral nervous systemCerebral cortexBiologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Deficient inhibitory neurotransmission has been demonstrated in schizophrenia through electroencephalography (e.g. P50 suppression) and transcranial magnetic stimulation (e.g. short-interval cortical inhibition and the cortical silent period). It is not known whether these inhibitory paradigms are related despite evidence suggesting that both are coordinated through gamma-aminobutyric acid inhibitory neurotransmission. We explored the relationship between P50 suppression, short-interval cortical inhibition and the cortical silent period in 21 healthy participants using previously published methods. P50 suppression was significantly correlated with cortical silent period (r=-0.49, P=0.02) but not with short-interval cortical inhibition. As both P50 suppression and the cortical silent period have been linked to gamma-aminobutyric acidB receptor-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission, these data highlight the importance of this receptor subtype in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.441

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.083
GPT teacher head0.330
Teacher spread0.247 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuroreportSame topicTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesFrench-language works237,207