MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2329992705

Evaluation of dissipation within an ILGA for computational electromagnetics: Research Articles

2004· article· en· W2329992705 on OpenAlexaffabout
J. Treurniet, N.R.S. Simons, Greg E. Bridges, M. Cuhaci

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Numerical Modelling Electronic Networks Devices and Fields · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCellular Automata and Applications
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre CanadaUniversity of ManitobaDefence Research and Development Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDissipationMassively parallelDispersion relationComputer scienceIsotropyElectromagneticsComputer simulationComputational scienceStatistical physicsApplied mathematicsPhysicsMathematicsParallel computingSimulationOpticsQuantum mechanics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Integer lattice gas automata (ILGA) are a method capable of electromagnetic field simulation that are suited to implementation on massively parallel computing architectures. The algorithm exhibits dispersion and dissipation and the purpose of this paper is to quantify the dissipation. A proposed model for the algorithm is based on a linear combination of transmission line matrix scattering and streaming operations. The dispersion relation for this model is derived and a numerical search of the dispersion relation is performed to quantify the dissipation of the model. Both the derived mathematical model and the results of numerical simulation indicate the dissipation observed fits the general form of viscosity. The isotropy of both square and hexagonal lattices are investigated. Copyright © 2004 Crown in the right of Canada. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.873
Threshold uncertainty score0.262

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.363
Teacher spread0.294 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Numerical Modelling Electronic Networks Devices and FieldsSame topicCellular Automata and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207