MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330004190 · doi:10.1093/jos/ffq019

A Note on Embedded Implicatures and Counterfactual Presuppositions

2010· article· en· W2330004190 on OpenAlexaffabout
Michela Ippolito

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Semantics · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCounterfactual thinkingPresuppositionSemantics (computer science)Counterfactual conditionalPhilosophyComputer scienceClassicsHistoryLinguisticsEpistemologyProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Journal Article A Note on Embedded Implicatures and Counterfactual Presuppositions Get access Michela Ippolito Michela Ippolito University of Toronto Search for other works by this author on: Oxford Academic Google Scholar Journal of Semantics, Volume 28, Issue 2, May 2011, Pages 267–278, https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffq019 Published: 20 October 2010 Article history Received: 01 February 2010 Revision received: 27 March 2010 Revision received: 09 June 2010 Revision received: 13 August 2010 Accepted: 13 August 2010 Published: 20 October 2010

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.018
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.018
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.020
Scholarly communication0.0060.022
Open science0.0020.007
Research integrity0.0040.014
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.265
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of SemanticsSame topicSyntax, Semantics, Linguistic VariationFrench-language works237,207