MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330136932 · doi:10.18647/2841/jjs-2009

Newly Identified Fragments of 1QIsa <sup>b</sup>

2009· article· en· W2330136932 on OpenAlexaff
Peter W. Flint, Nathaniel N. Dykstra

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Jewish Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Linguistic Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsListing (finance)ScrollColumn (typography)ArtCombinatoricsPhilosophyStereochemistryHistoryChemistryMathematicsArchaeologyGeometry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article begins with a review of the preliminary editions of 1QIsa b (by E. L. Sukenik, D. Barthélemy and E. Jain). Next follows a new listing of the scroll’s contents by column, as will appear in the forthcoming critical edition (DJD 32, ed. E. Ulrich and P. W. Flint). The main part presents the transcriptions, with comments and text-critical notes, of twelve newly identified fragments belonging to 1QIsa b . Photographs of all twelve fragments are placed together on Plate I.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.330
Threshold uncertainty score0.452

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.051
GPT teacher head0.354
Teacher spread0.304 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Jewish StudiesSame topicHistorical and Linguistic StudiesFrench-language works237,207