MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W2330186804 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-1118

Abstract 1118: Role of the type I insulin-like growth factor receptor in lung tumorigenesis

2011· article· en· W2330186804 on OpenAlexaff
S. Elizabeth Franks, Roger A. Moorehead

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCarcinogenesisLung cancerCancer researchA549 cellApoptosisCell growthInsulin-Like Growth Factor ReceptorInsulin-like growth factorCell cultureReceptorCancerBiologyMedicineGrowth factorEndocrinologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related mortalities worldwide. The type I insulin-like growth factor receptor (IGF-IR) is frequently expressed at high levels in lung cancer. This receptor is involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, migration and differentiation and is emerging as a potential target for molecular therapies. Furthermore, IGF-IR downregulation has been reported to sensitize cancer cells to agents that promote apoptosis. To investigate the importance of the IGF-IR in lung tumorigenesis, our lab generated doxycycline-inducible transgenic mice in which the IGF-IR was overexpressed in type II alveolar or Clara cells. IGF-IR overexpression was sufficient to induce lung tumor development in these mice indicating that this receptor has an important function in the initiation of lung tumorigenesis. To further investigate the role of IGF-IR in lung tumorigenesis, the levels and function of IGF-IR were evaluated in two human lung tumor cell lines (A549 and NCI-H358) and one murine lung tumor cell line (LA-4) as well as in human and murine normal bronchial epithelial cells. Western blotting revealed increased levels of IGF-IR in the lung cancer cell lines compared to the normal lung epithelial cells lines. The efficacy of the IGF-IR small-molecule inhibitor, BMS-754807, which is a drug currently in clinical trials, was also evaluated in the lung tumor cells. BMS-754807 inhibited A549, NCI-H358 and LA-4 cell survival in a dose-dependent manner with approximate IC50 concentrations of 1.70uM for A549, 1.25uM for NCI-H358 and 0.74uM for LA-4 cells. The effects of BMS-754807 on cell proliferation (Ki67 immunofluorescence), cell survival (JC-1 immunofluorescence) and migration (scratch wound and Boyden chamber assays) are currently being examined to determine which properties are affected by disruption of IGF-IR signaling. Similar studies will be performed following downregulation of IGF-IR expression using RNAi. To evaluate whether BMS-754807 could sensitize lung tumor cells to the cytotoxic effects of chemotherapeutic agents commonly employed in the treatment of human lung cancer, BMS-754807 was combined with cisplatin and with carboplatin. Neither the BMS-754807/cisplatin nor the BMS-754807/carboplatin combinations appeared to have a synergistic effect on cell survival. Combinations of BMS-754807 and lung cancer chemotherapeutic agents that do not target DNA are currently being evaluated. Additionally, key downstream molecules of the IGF-IR, including Akt and ERK1/2, are being studied as well as the transcription factor, KLF5, which is expressed at high levels in the lung tumors of the IGF-IR transgenic mice. Initial results support the importance of IGF-IR signaling in lung cancer. Further understanding of the function of IGF-IR in lung cancer will enable the development of more effective targeted therapies and improve existing therapeutic strategies. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1118. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-1118

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.046
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.286 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer Research→Same topicCancer, Hypoxia, and Metabolism→French-language works237,207→