XPS, AES, and Electrochemical Study of Iridium Oxide Coating Materials for Cardiovascular Stent Application
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The surface composition and morphology of iridium oxide (IrO2) coatings prepared by a multi-step physical vapor deposition process on 316L stainless steel stent substrates has been investigated by XPS, AES, and FESEM. The obtained data show that even though the morphologies of iridium oxide films produced within the examined range of PVD process parameters are almost identical, there is a difference in their surface composition, in particular in the ratios of Ir-O σ and Ir=O π bonds. A correlation between the surface stoichiometries of the IrO2 films and their electrochemical CV and EIS responses has been established. The observed differences in the O 1s photoemission line shape of the investigated iridium oxide films were strikingly reflected in their voltammetric curve features. The implication of these finding on the mechanism of the catalytic decomposition of hydrogen peroxide by IrO2 is discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it