Physiotherapy clinical teachers’ perceptions on important attributes in teaching – A Nigerian perspective
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Aim: The objective of this study was to investigate Nigerian physiotherapy teachers’ self-assessment on the attributes of effective clinical teaching and the importance attached to these attributes. Methodology: The McGill Clinical Teacher Evaluation including self-assessment and importance of the attributes of clinical teaching was used to survey 46 clinicians and academicians who teach physiotherapy in five of the seven physiotherapy programs in Nigeria. Descriptive and non-parametric statistics were used to analyze and interpret data. Results: Overall, the Nigerian teachers’ self- and importance rating on McGill clinical teachers’ attributes was high. The teachers rated themselves least on attributes related to challenging content from text and journals and encouraging student to take responsibility for their learning, while customizing clinical teaching to suit the students’ level and occasionally challenging content from texts and journals were the least important attributes. Academic faculty gave higher importance ratings for displaying good judgment in decision making than clinical faculty, while a modest link was found between years of post-professional experience and self-perception as effective teacher. Conclusion: The attributes with lowest self-assessment and importance may indicate areas for future concentration particularly in the Nigerian academic community, including curriculum content and design of physiotherapy teachers training.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".