MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330439201 · doi:10.1021/am303029k

Substrate-Mediated Gene Delivery from Glycol-Chitosan/Hyaluronic Acid Polyelectrolyte Multilayer Films

2013· article· en· W2330439201 on OpenAlexafffund
Christina Holmes, Maryam Tabrizian

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPolymer Surface Interaction Studies
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsPolyelectrolyteTransfectionMaterials scienceChitosanGene deliverySubstrate (aquarium)BiophysicsNanotechnologyChemical engineeringHyaluronic acidNucleic acidPolymerBiochemistryChemistryBiologyGeneComposite material

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Substrate-mediated transfection is one of the key strategies for localized gene delivery. Layer-by-layer (LbL) polyelectrolyte deposition is a promising technique which enables controlled delivery of a number of biofactors, including nucleic acids. Here, we embed lipoplexes containing plasmid DNA within polyelectrolyte multilayers composed of glycol-chitosan (Glyc-CHI) and hyaluronic acid (HA) in order to produce a film system that enables localized, surface-based transfection. The topography and morphology of the resulting multilayers were characterized after lipoplex absorption and during subsequent film build-up via atomic force microscopy (AFM) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. DNA embedding efficiency and release were then examined. Lipoplex-containing Glyc-CHI/HA films were found to successfully transfect NIH3T3 fibroblasts and HEK293 kidney cells in vitro, maintaining transfection levels of approximately 20% for a period of at least 7 days.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.223
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations43
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACS Applied Materials & InterfacesSame topicPolymer Surface Interaction StudiesFrench-language works237,207