A Rotamer Library to Enable Modeling and Design of Peptoid Foldamers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Peptoids are a family of synthetic oligomers composed of N-substituted glycine units. Along with other "foldamer" systems, peptoid oligomer sequences can be predictably designed to form a variety of stable secondary structures. It is not yet evident if foldamer design can be extended to reliably create tertiary structure features that mimic more complex biomolecular folds and functions. Computational modeling and prediction of peptoid conformations will likely play a critical role in enabling complex biomimetic designs. We introduce a computational approach to provide accurate conformational and energetic parameters for peptoid side chains needed for successful modeling and design. We find that peptoids can be described by a "rotamer" treatment, similar to that established for proteins, in which the peptoid side chains display rotational isomerism to populate discrete regions of the conformational landscape. Because of the insufficient number of solved peptoid structures, we have calculated the relative energies of side-chain conformational states to provide a backbone-dependent (BBD) rotamer library for a set of 54 different peptoid side chains. We evaluated two rotamer library development methods that employ quantum mechanics (QM) and/or molecular mechanics (MM) energy calculations to identify side-chain rotamers. We show by comparison to experimental peptoid structures that both methods provide an accurate prediction of peptoid side chain placements in folded peptoid oligomers and at protein interfaces. We have incorporated our peptoid rotamer libraries into ROSETTA, a molecular design package previously validated in the context of protein design and structure prediction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".