MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330445669 · doi:10.7202/1034386ar

Stratégie organisationnelle visant la promotion de la santé des infirmières oeuvrant en contexte de décès périnatal

2016· article· fr· W2330445669 on OpenAlex
Claudia Gonzalez, Marie Alderson, Marjolaine Héon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontières · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldPsychology
TopicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le décès d’un enfant, en cours de grossesse ou peu de temps après sa naissance, est un événement qui affecte le personnel infirmier. Confrontées aux émotions intenses des parents, les infirmières du milieu périnatal doivent continuer de prodiguer des soins, et ce, tout en gérant leurs propres émotions. Cet article a pour but de documenter les facteurs psychosociaux de l’environnement de travail en contexte de décès périnatal et leurs effets sur la santé des infirmières, afin de proposer une stratégie organisationnelle susceptible de contribuer à l’atténuation de ces facteurs stressants. Le modèle exigences-contrôle-soutien de Karasek et Theorell (1990) a guidé l’analyse des écrits à l’aide de ses concepts : la demande psychologique, la latitude décisionnelle et le soutien social. Des réflexions exposées, il ressort qu’il serait bénéfique d’améliorer le soutien organisationnel au sein des unités de périnatalité et de mieux outiller les infirmières face aux défis que pose le décès périnatal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.538
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.323 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it