MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Mental Work Influences Cardiovascular Responses Through a Reduction in Cardiac Parasympathetic Modulation in Healthy Adults

2011· article· en· W2330447820 on OpenAlexaff
Émilie Pérusse-Lachance, Jean‐Philippe Chaput, Patrice Brassard, Paul Poirier, Vicky Drapeau, Normand Teasdale, Caroline Senécal, Angelo Tremblay

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlood pressureHeart rateMedicineHeart rate variabilityInternal medicineContext (archaeology)Body mass indexCardiologyCrossover studyDiastoleAutonomic nervous systemPlacebo

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Mental work has progressively replaced physical work and has become an important modality of human activity in the context of economic competitiveness and globalization. This situation is closely linked to the high prevalence of cardiovascular diseases, such as systemic hypertension, noted in industrialized societies. PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the acute effect of mental effort on cardiovascular responses of young and healthy adults. METHODS: Using a randomized 2-condition crossover design, the impact of a 45-min reading and writing session and a control resting condition of similar duration, on blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), and heart rate variability (HRV) responses, was evaluated in 35 healthy adults (22 males and 13 females; age: 24±3 years old and body mass index: 23±2 kg/m2; mean±SD). BP was measured at three specific times (-15, 20 and 40 min) during both experimental conditions and was then averaged. HRV was measured with a Holter during both conditions. Variables in the time and frequency domains were analyzed. HR was measured with the Holter and represents a mean of the 45-min period for each condition. Women were tested within 10 days following the start of their menses. RESULTS: Diastolic BP (75±8 vs. 71±9 mm Hg; p < 0.05), HR (67±8 vs. 60±7 bpm; p < 0.05) as well as LF/HF ratio (2.8±1.4 vs. 1.9±1.1; p < 0.05) were higher during the mental work condition, while global HRV (SDNN: 88±27 vs.109±32 ms; p < 0.05) was lower when compared to the control condition. Moreover, cardiac parasympathetic activity indices were lower during the mental work versus the control condition (rMSSD: 52±19 vs. 67±21 ms, PNN50: 29±16 vs. 42±16 %, and HFln: 6.3±0.8 vs. 6.9±0.7 ms2; all p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that mental work acts as a stress factor, which increases blood pressure and heart rate through a decrease in cardiac parasympathetic modulation in healthy young adults. This study highlights the importance of considering mental work in the global study of systemic hypertension. While we now understand the acute influence of mental work on hemodynamics, its long-term cardiovascular impact remains to be elucidated and we speculate that it could play a role in the increased prevalence of systemic hypertension in our society.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.287
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicHeart Rate Variability and Autonomic ControlFrench-language works237,207