MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330465279 · doi:10.1021/ef101661n

Fouling Characteristics of Hydrocarbon Streams Containing Olefins and Conjugated Olefins

2011· article· en· W2330465279 on OpenAlexaff
Zhiming Fan, Parviz Rahimi, Teclemariam Alem, Andrew Eisenhawer, Patricia Arboleda

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsNalco (Canada)Natural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFoulingConjugated systemChemical engineeringAutoclaveCokePolymerizationChemistryOlefin fiberHydrocarbonOrganic chemistryCrackingCoker unitCatalysisPolymerMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The fouling characteristics of a coker gas oil (CGO) containing measurable amounts of olefins and conjugated olefins were investigated using a bench-scale hot liquid process simulator and a batch autoclave reactor at different temperatures. At low surface temperatures (∼200 °C), the fouling propensity of CGO is very low, and at surface temperatures between ∼250 and 325 °C, the fouling propensity is slightly higher because of polymerization of unsaturated olefins. When the surface temperature is further increased to above 350 °C, fouling is observed to increase significantly because of familiar coking reactions. Slow polymerization of olefins and conjugated olefins was observed at temperatures of 270 and 300 °C. However, at 350 °C, thermal cracking reactions that produce olefins and conjugated olefins take place and significant amounts of fouling deposits can be formed at this temperature. The fouling deposits of CGO exhibit typical polyaromatic coke structures. A better understanding of how the various mechanisms interact with temperature will improve management of fouling in process streams containing olefins and conjugated olefins.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.088
Threshold uncertainty score0.760

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207