The Conserved Trp–Cys Hydrogen Bond Dampens the “Push Effect” of the Heme Cysteinate Proximal Ligand during the First Catalytic Cycle of Nitric Oxide Synthase
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Residues surrounding and interacting with the heme proximal ligand are important for efficient catalysis by heme proteins. The nitric oxide synthases (NOSs) are thiolate-coordinated enzymes that catalyze the hydroxylation of l-Arg in the first of the two catalytic cycles needed to synthesize nitric oxide. In NOSs, the indole NH group of a conserved tryptophan [W56 of the bacterial NOS-like protein from Staphylococcus aureus (saNOS)] forms a hydrogen bond with the heme proximal cysteinate ligand. The purpose of this study was to determine the impact of increasing (W56F and W56Y variants) or decreasing (W56H variant) the electron density of the proximal cysteinate ligand on molecular oxygen (O(2)) activation using saNOS as a model. We show that the removal of the indole NH···S(-) bond for W56F and W56Y caused an increase in the electron density of the cysteinate. This was probed by the decrease of the midpoint reduction potential (E(1/2)) along with weakened σ-bonding and strengthened π-backbonding with distal ligands (CO and O(2)). On the other hand, the W56H variant showed stronger Fe-OO and Fe-CO bonds (strengthened σ-bonding) along with an elevated E(1/2), which is consistent with the formation of a strong NH···S(-) hydrogen bond from H56. We also show here that changing the electron density of the proximal thiolate controls its "push effect"; whereas the rates of both O(2) activation and autoxidation of the Fe(II)O(2) complex increase with the stronger push effect created by removing the indole NH···S(-) hydrogen bond (W56F and W56Y variants), the W56H variant showed an increased stability of the complex against autoxidation and a slower rate of O(2) activation. These results are discussed with regard to the roles played by the conserved tryptophan-cysteinate interaction in the first catalytic cycle of NOS.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".