MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330515971 · doi:10.3749/canmin.49.5.1221

THE CRYSTAL STRUCTURE AND CRYSTAL CHEMISTRY OF MANITOBAITE, IDEALLY (Na16 )Mn2+ 25Al8(PO4)30, FROM CROSS LAKE, MANITOBA

2011· article· en· W2330515971 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Mineralogist · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCrystal Structures and Properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrystal (programming language)Crystal chemistryCrystallographyCrystal structureChemistryGeologyGeochemistryMineralogy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The crystal structures of green (brown) variants of manitobaite, ideally (Na 16 □)Mn 2+ 25 Al 8 (PO 4 ) 30 , monoclinic, Pc , Z = 2: green: a 13.4517(7), b 12.5266(7), c 26.6765(13) A, β 101.582(1)°, V 4403.6(7) A 3 , D calc. 3.642 g/cm 3 ; brown: 13.4499(6), b 12.5046(5), c 26.6148(11) A, β 101.221(1)°, V 4390.7(5)(3) A 3 , D calc. 3.621 g/cm 3 , from pegmatite #22 at Cross Lake, Manitoba, Canada, have been solved by direct methods and refined to R 1 = 5.0 (6.0)% for 22,580 (25,613) unique ( F o > 4σ F ) reflections collected on a Bruker single-crystal P 4 diffractometer equipped with a 4K CCD detector and Mo K α X-radiation. Chemical analysis by electron microprobe plus Fe 3+ determination by Mossbauer spectroscopy gave: green: P 2 O 5 44.19, Al 2 O 3 6.91, Fe 2 O 3 1.73, FeO 6.23, MnO 27.57, ZnO 0.54, MgO 0.73, CaO 1.71, Na 2 O 9.97, sum 99.58 wt%; brown: P 2 O 5 44.42, Al 2 O 3 6.96, Fe 2 O 3 3.54, FeO 4.66, MnO 27.86, ZnO 0.53, MgO 0.81, CaO 1.59, Na 2 O 8.94, sum 99.32 wt%. The resulting empirical formulae are as follows: green: Na 15.55 Ca 1.47 Mg 0.88 Fe 2+ 4.19 Mn 2+ 18.78 Zn 0.32 Al 6.54 Fe 3+ 1.05 P 30.08 O 120 ; brown: Na 13.90 Ca 1.37 Mg 0.97 Fe 2+ 3.12 Mn 2+ 18.92 Zn 0.31 Al 6.58 Fe 3+ 2.09 P 30.15 O 120 . The general formula of manitobaite is (Na 16 □)(Mn 2+ ,Fe 2+ ,Mg,Zn,Ca) 25 (Al,Fe 3+ ) 8 (PO 4 ) 30 , and the end-member formula is (Na 16 □)Mn 2+ 25 Al 8 (PO 4 ) 30 . There are 80 cation sites and 120 anion sites in the structure. There are 30 tetrahedrally coordinated sites occupied by P, 33 octahedrally coordinated sites occupied by Mn 2+ , Fe 2+ , Al, Fe 3+ plus minor Mg and Zn, and 17 sites occupied predominantly by Na with coordination numbers from [5] to [8]. Manitobaite is an ordered superstructure of the alluaudite structure. In particular, there are eight octahedrally coordinated sites occupied predominantly by Al, emphasizing the key role of Al in producing superstructures in these minerals.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.785
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it