Size Dependence of Temperature-Related Optical Properties of PbS and PbS/CdS Core/Shell Quantum Dots
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of PbS core size on the temperature-dependent photoluminescence (PL) of PbS/CdS quantum dots (QDs) in the temperature range of 100–300 K was thoroughly investigated and compared with shell-free PbS QDs. The core/shell QDs show significantly smaller PL intensity variation with temperature at a smaller PbS size, while a larger activation energy when the PbS domain size is relatively large, suggesting both different density and different distribution of defects/traps in the PbS and PbS/CdS QDs. The most remarkable difference consists in the PbS size dependence of the energy gap temperature coefficient (d E /d T ). The PbS/CdS QDs show unusual non-monotonic d E /d T variation, resulting in the reversal of the d E /d T difference between the PbS and PbS/CdS QDs at a larger PbS size. In combination with theoretical calculations, we find that, although lattice dilation and carrier-phonon coupling are generally considered as dominant terms, the unique negative contribution to d E /d T from the core/shell interfacial strain becomes most important in the relatively larger-core PbS@CdS QDs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".