MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330638568 · doi:10.1021/ef401190b

The Preparation of Hierarchical Flowerlike NiO/Reduced Graphene Oxide Composites for High Performance Supercapacitor Applications

2013· article· en· W2330638568 on OpenAlexaff
Wei Li, Yongfeng Bu, Huile Jin, Jian Wang, Weiming Zhang, Shun Wang, Jichang Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueEnergy & Fuels · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicSupercapacitor Materials and Fabrication
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Windsor
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsGrapheneNon-blocking I/OSupercapacitorMaterials scienceOxideX-ray photoelectron spectroscopyFourier transform infrared spectroscopyScanning electron microscopeComposite materialComposite numberElectrolyteChemical engineeringElectrodeCapacitanceNanotechnologyCatalysisChemistryMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Reduced graphene oxide (rGO) and NiO composites were prepared with an environmentally friendly method, in which hydrogen gas was employed as the reducing agent to convert reduced graphene oxides. Our study indicates that the success of this new approach is because NiO not only is an additive of the composites but also acts as a catalyst to facilitate the reduction. Characterization with scanning electron microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and X-ray powder diffraction illustrates that the as-prepared rGO/NiO composites have a three-dimensional flowerlike hierarchical structure, which prevents graphene from taking face to face aggregation and therefore greatly improves the stability of the composite materials. A hybrid capacitor electrode made of the NiO/rGO composites shows great performance, in which the maximum specific capacitance is close to 428 F g –1 at a discharge current density of 0.38 A g –1 in a 6.0 M KOH electrolyte.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.024
Threshold uncertainty score0.466

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations148
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEnergy & FuelsSame topicSupercapacitor Materials and FabricationFrench-language works237,207