MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330644066 · doi:10.2514/6.2014-4422

Validating Microsatellite Star Tracker Baffle Tests

2014· article· en· W2330644066 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA/AAS Astrodynamics Specialist Conference · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAstronomical Observations and Instrumentation
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
FundersUniversity of Colorado BoulderVedecká Grantová Agentúra MŠVVaŠ SR a SAVSpace Telescope Science Institute
KeywordsBaffleStar (game theory)Computer scienceStar trackerPhysicsAstronomyEngineeringAstrophysicsMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper discusses the historical challenges of atmospheric stray light testing for star trackers relevant to small research groups. We define optical system attenuation targets for a baffled star tracker system using a probabilistic analysis of false detection rates that is independent of a baffle design. Using our hybridized stray light analysis techniques, we obtain attenuation curves for the Sinclair Interplanetary ST-16 baffled star tracker, and we validate our analysis by performing stray light analysis on the baffle independently from the sensor. Solar exclusion angles are defined by combining the attenuation targets and the system attenuation curve, of which we explore in-depth by using ray tracing path information from Zemax OpticStudio 14. These techniques should prove invaluable for small research groups who do not have the financial means to expedite the stray light analysis of their star tracker system to a professional third party laboratory.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.727
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it