Ritual and cult crimes and the characteristics of their perpetrators
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper the criminality aspect of ritual crimes that are the result of accepting the cult value system is discussed. Successfully finding and prosecuting perpetrators of such acts impose requirements of above-average knowledge of context and value system from which perpetrators arise. If there are indications of ritual, sacred or cultic dimensions of a crime application of multidisciplinary criteria, is necessary in order to clearly define the distinction between inauthentic cult milieu (which usually occurs under the influence of the media) and real phenomena which indicate the affiliation of the perpetrator group cult character or value system that can inspire a crime. In paper is also discussed about he attempts of modern democratic societies to establish a better balance between principle of multi-confensionality and dangers of increased misuse of democratic institutions due to development of new technologies such as Internet. This paper presents examples of ritual crimes in the Republic of Serbia and provide practical recommendations aimed at criminological and criminal-methodological approach to this issue.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it