MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330694438 · doi:10.2138/am-2002-0422

Disordering during melting: An <sup>17</sup> O NMR Study of crystalline and glassy CaTiSiO <sub>5</sub> (titanite)

2002· article· en· W2330694438 on OpenAlexaff
Scott Kroeker, D. E. Rice, Jonathan F. Stebbins

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Mineralogist · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGlass properties and applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTitaniteNMR spectra databaseAnisotropyIsotropyCrystal (programming language)Spectral lineChemical shiftCrystallographyPhase (matter)Materials scienceAtom (system on chip)Coupling constantAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Nuclear magnetic resonanceMineralogyChemistryPhysicsMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Although titanite (CaTiSiO 5 ) has one of the highest known entropies of fusion among silicates, the corresponding melt is a relatively good glass-former, which provides an opportunity to investigate the structural origin of disorder in the liquid. Here we present an 17 O NMR study of CaTiSiO 5 glass, using detailed new results on the crystalline phase, collected at magnetic fields of 9.4, 14.1, 18.8, and 21.1 Tesla, to interpret the spectra. We find that the glass contains significant concentrations of Si-O-Si and Si-O-Ca sites in addition to the Ti-O-Ti and Ti-O-Si sites of the crystal, suggesting considerable network disorder. Simulations of the spectra for the crystal allow the derivation of isotropic chemical shifts and quadrupolar coupling constants (C Q ) for each of the five O atom sites. In addition the Ti-O-Ti site has an unusually large chemical shift anisotropy and an unusually small C Q value.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations24
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmerican MineralogistSame topicGlass properties and applicationsFrench-language works237,207