Optoelectronic Properties and Structural Effects of the Incremental Addition of Pyridyl Moieties on a Rhodium Dimer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The synthesis and characterization of five C-C coupling products obtained from the reaction of a paddlewheel tetrakis 4-bromo-N,N'-diphenylbenzamidinate dirhodium dimer with 4-pyridineboronic acid pinacol ester are reported. The coupling reactions occur on one to four amidinate ligands, leading to rhodium dimers containing [tetrakis, tris, cis-bis, trans-bis, or mono]-N,N'-diphenyl-4-(pyridin-4-yl)benzamidinate ligands, effectively creating new binding sites on the metal complexes. The new compounds were isolated by column chromatography, and the exact conformations were verified by X-ray crystallography. Redox processes showed only a small variation within the coupling products and included two oxidations (1.30 ± 0.02 V, 0.27 ± 0.01 V vs SCE) and one reduction (-1.55 ± 0.02 V vs SCE), all centered on the Rh-Rh core. Time-dependent density functional theory (TD-DFT) was used to analyze this series with four other fully characterized N,N'-diphenyl-aryl-amidinate rhodium dimers that were found in the literature. The two main absorption bands of these nine rhodium dimers were compared to TD-DFT calculations, both giving excellent correlation. The first, a metal-to-metal (MM) transition around 11800 cm(-1) (845 nm) was blue-shifted in the calculation, with an average difference of 1378 cm(-1) but had only a 15 cm(-1) standard deviation, showing a strong correlation despite the energy difference. The second, a metal-to-ligand charge transfer (MLCT) transition around 18900 cm(-1) (530 nm) was a near perfect match with only a 64 cm(-1) average difference and a 35 cm(-1) standard deviation. The electronic transition, redox potentials, and HOMO and LUMO energies of all dimers were plotted versus the Hammett parameter (σ) of the aryl group and Taft's model with 2 components: field effects (σF) and resonance (σR). The properties involving only the Rh-Rh core (MM band, all oxidation potentials, HOMO and LUMO) were fit with a single set of σF and σR contributions (73% and 27%), with a goodness-of-fit (R(2)) value ranging from 90% to 99.7%. The metal-dimer to ligand charge-transfer band, involving the amidinate ligand, displayed different values of contribution with 45% and 55% for the σF and σR, respectively, with a fit of 94.8%. The accuracy of these fits enables the designed modification of amidinate-based dirhodium complexes to achieve desirable redox and spectroscopic properties.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".