Surface Eroding, Liquid Injectable Polymers Based on 5-Ethylene Ketal ε-Caprolactone
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Liquid, injectable hydrophobic polymers are potentially useful as depot systems for localized drug delivery. Low molecular weight polymers of 5-ethylene ketal ε-caprolactone and copolymers of this monomer with D,L-lactide were prepared and their properties assessed with respect to their suitability for this purpose. The polymers were amorphous and of low viscosity, and the viscosity was adjustable by choice of initiator and/or by copolymerizing with D,L-lactide. Lower viscosity polymers were attained by using 350 Da methoxy poly(ethylene glycol) as an initiator in comparison to octan-1-ol, while copolymerization with D,L-lactide increased viscosity. The initiator used had no significant effect on the rate of mass loss in vitro, and copolymers with D,L-lactide (DLLA) degraded faster than 5-ethylene ketal ε-caprolactone (EKC) homopolymers. For the EKC-based polymers, a nearly constant degradation rate was observed. This finding was attributed to the hydrolytic susceptibility of the EKC-EKC ester linkage, which was comparable to that of DLLA-DLLA, coupled with a higher molecular weight of the water-soluble degradation product and the low initial molecular weight of the EKC-based polymers. Cytotoxicity of the hydrolyzed EKC monomer to 3T3 fibroblast cells was comparable to that of ε-caprolactone, suggesting that polymers prepared from EKC may be well tolerated upon in vivo implantation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".