MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330742258 · doi:10.2190/il.21.2.c

Vigils for the Dying: Origin and Functions of a Persistent Tradition

2013· article· en· W2330742258 on OpenAlexaff
Allan Kellehear

Bibliographic record

VenueIllness Crisis & Loss · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental Health
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGriefDissentRelation (database)PsychologySocial psychologySociologyPsychoanalysisPsychotherapistLawPolitical sciencePolitics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article argues that vigils for the dying owe their origins to traditional wake behavior. By viewing vigils for the dying as wake behavior, the different social conduct observed around vigils for the dying can be viewed more systematically and predictably. Vigils represent so much more than ways to manage loss and grief or to shore up support at a difficult time for the dying and their families. Vigils help establish the reality of death, protect and advocate for the dying person, and can express dissent and re-exert control over the circumstances of dying and death. The implications of these various social functions are discussed in relation to their conceptual limitations and implications for further empirical research.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.378
Threshold uncertainty score0.499

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.332
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIllness Crisis & LossSame topicGrief, Bereavement, and Mental HealthFrench-language works237,207