MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330744928 · doi:10.1213/ane.0000000000000599

The Incidence of Propofol Vial Coring with Blunt Needle Use Is Reduced with Angled Puncture Compared with Perpendicular Puncture

2015· letter· en· W2330744928 on OpenAlex
Ferrante S. Gragasin, Z. A. Neethling van den Heever

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueAnesthesia & Analgesia · 2015
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicIntramuscular injections and effects
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta HospitalUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCoringMedicineVialBluntSurgeryNatural rubberBevelPerpendicularHematomaAnesthesiaComposite materialDrillingChromatographyMaterials scienceGeometryMechanical engineeringMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

To the Editor We have noticed that coring occurs when puncturing the rubber stopper of 20 mL 1% propofol vials manufactured by AstraZeneca (London, United Kingdom) and using the BD™ short plastic blunt fill needles. We sought to determine the incidence of coring and whether coring can be reduced with different angles of needle puncture. Basic vector principles dictate that, for a given force (i.e., needle impalement of the medication rubber stopper), the amount of force required to pierce the stopper in the vertical plane is reduced with an angled approach (approximately 45°) compared with a perpendicular approach (approximately 90°). This methodology has been suggested to be effective with sharp beveled needle puncture of the rubber stopper.1 Therefore, we hypothesized that an angled approach will reduce the incidence of coring with this particular blunt fill needle. The rubber stoppers of 20 mL 1% propofol vials (Diprivan®; AstraZeneca Canada, Mississauga, Ontario) were punctured with the BD™ short plastic blunt fill needles. The stoppers were punctured in 1 of 2 ways: a perpendicular puncture (approximately 90°; Fig. 1A) and an angled puncture (approximately 45°; Fig. 1B). After puncture occurred, the vials were thoroughly inspected with the naked eye to look for coring. During this current investigation, published data indicating the incidence of coring with blunt needles were approximately 29%.2 We calculated that the minimal sample size needed to effect a 50% reduction with 80% power and alpha error of 0.05 was 137 for each group. To strengthen the study, we increased our sample size to approximately 250 per group. A 2 × 2 contingency table was used to summarize the data, and Fisher exact test was used to analyze the results.Figure 1: Comparison of actual vial approaches with the BD™ plastic blunt needle. A, Perpendicular puncture is a 90° approach to the vial. B, Acute angle puncture is an approximately 45° approach to the vial.The contingency table is presented in Table 1. Coring occurred in 29.2% of the perpendicular puncture group and 15.2% in the angled puncture group (P = 0.0001). There was a 47.8% reduction in coring (95% confidence interval, 26.8%–63.0%) when the angled puncture technique was used. The primary finding is that the frequency of coring with blunt needle impalement of the rubber stopper of Diprivan® vials is reduced with angled puncture compared with perpendicular puncture. By using an angled puncture technique, we achieved an almost 50% reduction in coring.Table 1: Contingency Table for Propofol Vial Coring with Blunt Fill Needles: Straight Versus Acute Angle PunctureThe clinical significance of coring and its microembolic consequences is not well described, likely because it does not have an immediate effect when it is accidentally injected.3,4 Certain manufactures have booklets on “Particulate Contamination” (e.g., Brauna) and describe the ways to prevent intravascular contamination from occurring, which includes the use of in-line IV filters and filter needles for medication aspiration. However, when aspirating propofol, these needles cause slow aspiration as well as the formation of many air bubbles, which can be an inconvenience in a busy practice. The BD™ short plastic blunt fill needle allows for rapid aspiration of propofol with minimal air bubbles, and we nonetheless report a simple technique to reduce the chances of obtaining a core with these blunt needles. It has been suggested that the use of blunt fill needles may reduce the risk of coring (while reducing the incidence of needle-stick injuries)1; however, this current study revealed that coring with the BD™ blunt fill needle still incurred a 29% incidence of coring. Although we only investigated Diprivan® vials, these findings may potentially be expanded to other medication vials. In addition to using this technique to puncture vials, we still recommend that all vials and syringes be inspected rigorously after puncture and aspiration to ensure that no cores can be seen, irrespective of angle of approach of puncture with blunt needles. Ferrante S. Gragasin, MD, PhD, FRCPC Z. A. Neethling van den Heever, MB, ChB, DA (SA) Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada [email protected]

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.075
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.232
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it