MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W23307599 · doi:10.1007/s00277-012-1665-1

El sueño como lenguaje en la poética de Borges

2004· article· en· W23307599 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueContextos: Estudios de Humanidades y Ciencias Sociales · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicBorges, Kipling, and Jewish Identity
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Patients with hereditary spherocytosis (HS) are often thought to have an increased risk of blunt splenic injury (BSI) from trauma due to splenomegaly. We aim to quantify this risk. Using a population-based database consisting of all injury-related admissions in Canada from 2001 to 2010, we identified patients with BSI and HS based on the discharge diagnoses. Intercensal population estimates were used to derive rates of BSI. The HS population at risk for BSI was estimated based on population rates of HS obtained from the literature. Rates of BSI in the HS population were estimated and the relative rates of BSI were calculated to compare the populations with and without HS. There were 10,106 patients with BSI over 202,405,788 person-years of observation, yielding an overall rate of BSI in the general population of 5.0 BSI per 100,000 person-years. Of these BSI patients, only two had a history of HS. Population rates of HS in the literature range from 1 in 2,000 to 5,000, corresponding to a low estimate of 2.0 and a high estimate of 4.9 BSI per 100,000 person-years in the HS population. The relative rate of BSI in the population with HS compared to the population without HS ranged from a low of 0.4 (95 % CI 0.1-1.4) to a high of 1.0 (0.1-3.6). The rate of BSI in the HS patient population appears not to differ significantly from those in the general population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.543
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.059
GPT teacher head0.295
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it