MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330817259 · doi:10.14288/1.0052321

Triassic doig formation sand bodies in the Peace River area of western Canada : depositional and structural models, and the impact of diagenesis on reservoir properties

2009· article· en· W2330817259 on OpenAlexaffabout
Richard Harris

Bibliographic record

VenuecIRcle (University of British Columbia) · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentary depositional environmentDiagenesisGeologyGeochemistryGeomorphology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Middle Triassic Doig reservoirs in the Fireweed, Buick Creek, Cache Creek and West Stoddart fields (94-A-13 to Twp.86, Rge.18) of northeastern British Columbia consist of deltaic and shoreline sands encased in shelf and offshore mudstones and siltstones. The reservoirs comprise a series of northwest and northeast trending elongate sand bodies that lie along a south-southeast depositional trend analogous to the position of the original Doig shoreline. Sediments of the Doig Formation are divisible into two facies associations and ten lithofacies representing deposition in shelf to offshore, and deltaic and inter-deltaic environments. Hydrocarbon producing intervals consist of clean, very fine to fine grained, sub-lithic to quartz arenites, inter-bedded sandstones and bioclastic detritus, and disseminated bioclasts. Effective porosity is primarily inter-granular in the sandstone facies with significant moldic and intra-granular porosity developed in the coquina facies at the West Stoddart and Cache Creek fields. Average porosities range from 6.5 - 9.5% for sandstone lithofacies and 4.9 - 8.6% for coquina lithofacies. Pore occluding cements are mainly calcite in the northwest part of the reservoir trend to dolomite and anhydrite in the southeast. The sedimentology and facies architecture of recent discoveries at Cache Creek and West Stoddart contrast with those identified in previous studies of Doig reservoirs at Buick Creek in northeastern British Columbia and Sinclair in west central Alberta. A three-dimensional facies model of the Doig Formation at the Cache Creek, West Stoddart and Fireweed fields depicts sandstone deposition in a deltaic environment as distributary channel fills and slumped delta front deposits. Data for the Buick Creek field confirms and extends the incised shoreface model to include fluvial or tidal channels deposited laterally continuous in the same systems tract as the shoreface sands. Sand bodies for all four fields were deposited contemporaneously as the Doig shoreline prograded over mudstones and siltstones of the Doig shelf. Seismic and well data reveal tectonic control on the position and orientation of the Doig reservoir trend. Synsedimentary growth faults control the location and geometry of thick sand bodies along the reservoir trend in the Fireweed area. Diagenetic controls along the reservoir trend include the precipitation of calcite in the near surface and shallow burial realm, fracturing of cemented horizons prior to extensive burial and dissolution of cements and framework grains in three distinct episodes. Multiple dissolution phases created moldic, vuggy and inter-granular secondary porosity. Reservoir quality and production from Doig Formation sand bodies in the Peace River area of Western Canada are significantly impacted by the preservation of inter-granular porosity and fracturing related to the distribution of early calcite cements. The early calcite cements were sourced from bioclastic debris and calcareous mudstones distributed during sand body deposition. The formation of open fractures during early diagenesis enhanced both the secondary pore network and the permeability of the West Stoddart and Cache Creek Doig pools. Sand bodies with only minor interstitial calcite have extensive porosity loss by compaction and precipitation of authigenic quartz. A fairway for Doig sand body exploration is constrained by production and core analysis data, structural and depositional models, thermal maturity data and diagenesis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.105

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.174
Teacher spread0.161 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuecIRcle (University of British Columbia)Same topicHydrocarbon exploration and reservoir analysisFrench-language works237,207