MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330869934 · doi:10.2310/7750.2008.07085

Skin Thickening in a Hemodialysis Patient: A Case of Nephrogenic Fibrosing Dermopathy

2009· article· en· W2330869934 on OpenAlexaffabout
Ayman Al Habeeb, Sara L. Partington, Donald Rosenthal, Samih Salama

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicLanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSkin biopsyDermisThrombosisCalciphylaxisPathologyNephrogenic systemic fibrosisFibrosisHemodialysisBiopsyPrurigo nodularisSurgeryDermatologyKidney diseaseDiseaseInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: Nephrogenic fibrosing dermopathy (NFD), a rare fibrosing condition of the skin, occurs in patients with renal failure. Worldwide, 215 cases have been reported, but none of them are from Canada. CASE REPORT: A 71-year-old woman with hypertensive vasculopathy and renal failure, hypothyroidism, deep vein thrombosis, and a previous abdominal aneurysm repair presented with the rapid development of indurated skin over her arms and legs. These skin changes developed 5 months after starting hemodialysis. BIOPSY RESULTS: Skin biopsies demonstrated thickened collagen bundles in the dermis with extension into the subcutaneous tissue and minimal increased mucin production. There were increased fibroblastic cells that were immunohistochemically CD34 positive. CONCLUSIONS: This patient has the clinical and pathologic features of NFD. Interestingly, this patient had a history of vein thrombosis and vascular surgery, emphasizing the possible role these features may play as instigators of fibrosis in this disease.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.545
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cutaneous Medicine and SurgerySame topicLanthanide and Transition Metal ComplexesFrench-language works237,207