MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330895155 · doi:10.1055/s-0034-1376650

Link-N is Cleaved by Human Annulus Fibrosus Cells Generating a Fragment with Retained Biological Activity

2014· article· en· W2330895155 on OpenAlexaffabout
Rahul Gawri, Jean Ouellet, Patrik Önnerfjord, Bashar Alkhatib, Thomas Steffen, Dick Heinegård, Peter J. Roughley, John Antoniou, F. Mwale, Lisbet Haglund

Bibliographic record

VenueGlobal Spine Journal · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Canadian institutionsShriners Hospitals for Children - CanadaMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIntervertebral discMedicinePopulationAnnulus (botany)In vivoEx vivoIn vitroLumbarType II collagenDegeneration (medical)CartilageAnatomyCell biologyPathologyChemistryBiologyBiochemistryGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Back pain affects a large portion of the population across all ages, and intervertebral disc (IVD) degeneration is its most common cause. Presently, there are no established treatments to prevent, stop, or even retard disc degeneration, and surgery is often the offered option. Previous studies have shown that Link-N can act as a growth factor and stimulate the synthesis of proteoglycans and collagens in articular cartilage, in bovine IVD in vitro, and in intact human IVDs ex vivo, as well as increase disc height in a rabbit model of disc degeneration. However, the sequences in Link-N involved in modulating cellular activity and the stability of Link-N in the presence of IVD cells are not well understood. Materials and Methods Human lumbar spines were obtained through the Transplant Quebec's organ donation program. Six spinal segments were retrieved (mean age 30 years) and IVD cells were isolated from the nucleus pulposus (NP) and inner annulus fibrosus (iAF) regions by sequential enzymatic digestion. IVD cells were cultured in monolayer in the presence of Link-N to assess its stability in culture. Media was collected at designated time points from the cultures and was analyzed by MALDI-TOF and MS-MS mass spectrophotometry to evaluate the stability of Link-N peptide. IVD cells embedded in 1.2% alginate were exposed to the identified Link-N fragments and to the native scrambled or reversed Link-N peptides in the absence and presence of IL-1β to assess the biological activity of the peptides. SO 4 incorporation was used to assess proteoglycan synthesis in response to the peptides. All peptides were used at equimolar concentrations. Results Mass spectrometric analysis revealed that a peptide spanning residues 1 to 8 was generated in the presence of human AF, while the original 16 amino acids peptide remained intact in the presence of NP cells. Link-N 1-8 significantly induced proteoglycan production in the absence and presence of IL-1β in both human NP and AF cells, confirming that the biological effect is maintained within the first 8 amino acids of the peptide. A reversed or scrambled Link-N peptide, as well as residues 9-16 of Link-N, had no biological effect. Conclusion In conclusion, Link-N 1-8 peptide is a promising therapeutic alternative for treating early disc degeneration before major collagen degradation has occurred. One advantage in using this shorter 8 amino acid peptide rather than the original 16 amino acid Link-N in therapy is the production cost. More important, this small size should be amenable to medicinal chemists allowing them to optimize the structure for maximal biological activity and stability. Thus Link-N 1-8 could be a promising candidate for biologically induced disc repair, and the identification of such a stable specific peptide may facilitate the design of compounds to promote disc repair and provide alternatives to surgical intervention for early stage disc degeneration. Disclosure of Interest None declared

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.288
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGlobal Spine JournalSame topicSpine and Intervertebral Disc PathologyFrench-language works237,207