MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330922403 · doi:10.2514/6.2009-1983

Wind Disturbance Estimation and Rejection for Quadrotor Position Control

2009· article· en· W2330922403 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAIAA Infotech@Aerospace Conference · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdaptive Control of Nonlinear Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDisturbance (geology)Position (finance)Control theory (sociology)Active disturbance rejection controlControl (management)EstimationComputer scienceControl engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceGeologyPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ight control can be quite signicant, and can lead to dangerous situations when operating in close proximity to obstacles or other aerial vehicles. This work seeks to improve quadrotor positioning performance by formally modeling the wind eects on quadrotor dynamics in order to estimate wind velocities in ight and control the vehicle accordingly. Models for wind disturbances, quadrotor dynamics in wind and onboard measurements are presented and an estimation algorithm is developed for the current wind velocity experienced by the vehicle. This wind estimate is used to improve positioning accuracy by both eliminating the eect of wind on the feedback position control law and adding a wind compensator to mitigate the eect of the expected wind disturbance. Simulation results are presented for multiple scenarios, and work is ongoing for implementation on board a quadrotor testbed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it