MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330947924 · doi:10.1061/9780784412848.201

Incremental Dynamic Analysis of Existing Steel Braced Frame Buildings in Moderate Seismic Zones

2013· article· en· W2330947924 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueStructures Congress 2013 · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSeismic Performance and Analysis
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFragilitySeismic analysisBuilding codeIncremental Dynamic AnalysisSeismologyGeologyStructural engineeringEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Concentrically braced frames (CBF) are among the most popular structural systems used in Eastern Canada for low- and middle-rise buildings. Across southern Quebec, in the area of St. Lawrence and Ottawa River valleys, existing vulnerable buildings, designed and built prior to the development of modern seismic design codes are at risk due to an increase in earthquake activity. This study is focused on the seismic assessment of 3- and 6-storey CBF buildings located in Montreal and Quebec that were designed based on the 1980 Canadian code provisions. Using incremental dynamic analysis and the fitted fragility curves, the probability of failure of selected structures are estimated. It is concluded that both low- and middle-rise CBF buildings located in Montreal and Quebec are exposed to earthquake damage risk.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.044
Threshold uncertainty score0.940

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.245
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it