MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2330954844 · doi:10.1177/1750698014558659

A home for loss: Doris Salcedo’s melancholic archives

2014· article· en· W2330954844 on OpenAlexafffund
Claudette Lauzon

Bibliographic record

VenueMemory Studies · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicPublic Spaces through Art
Canadian institutionsOntario College of Art and Design
FundersSocial Sciences and Humanities Research Council of CanadaUniversity of Toronto
KeywordsWitnessPoliticsSculptureDoris (gastropod)Closure (psychology)HistoryArtVisual artsArt historyLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article considers the art practice of Bogotá-based sculptor Doris Salcedo, whose work has primarily involved transforming testimonies of political violence in Colombia into abstracted assemblages that bear witness to suffering and loss. Melancholic archives that cling to their capacity to accommodate what remains of loss but also recognise their own structural provisionality, Salcedo’s sculptures and installations represent a process of excavation and archivisation that, by failing to coalesce into sites of closure or redemption, disclose art’s capacity to unsettle our collective access to the past while insisting nevertheless on bearing witness to the suffering of others. Radically reconsidering the archive’s putative status as a ‘home’ for memory, Salcedo’s practice at the same time figures home as an (impossible) archive for memories of loss, terror and displacement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0120.010
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.007
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.049
GPT teacher head0.366
Teacher spread0.317 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMemory StudiesSame topicPublic Spaces through ArtFrench-language works237,207