Patent Ductus Arteriosus: Optimal Fluid Requirements in Preterm Infants
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Fluid management of preterm infants who have suspected or confirmed patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) can be challenging. It is vital for clinicians to understand fluid and cardiovascular changes that occur at birth and during PDA management to gain a better appreciation of the pathologic processes that could influence the clinical course of an affected infant. Furthermore, knowledge of current and effective treatment strategies is important to provide optimal care for this cohort of fragile infants. The aims of this review are to: 1) Determine the relationship between fluid management and PDA-related morbidities such as renal failure and intraventricular hemorrhage, duration of oxygenation, mechanical ventilation, and hemodynamic stability from the available scientific literature; 2) Assess the effects of fluid restriction in preterm infants who have suspected or confirmed PDA; and 3) Develop guidelines for fluid management once a decision is made to intervene medically or surgically. Based on the available evidence, we propose guidelines for fluid management of a hemodynamically significant PDA (HSDA) during treatment and through the neonatal course following postoperative ductal ligation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it