MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2331080847 · doi:10.1021/jp305534d

The van der Waals Interactions in Sphere-Shell and Cone-Shell Configurations

2012· article· en· W2331080847 on OpenAlexaff
Américo Boza Troncoso, Edgar Acosta

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry B · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMaterial Dynamics and Properties
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
Keywordsvan der Waals forceShell (structure)Surface tensionSpherical shellPhysicsMicelleCone (formal languages)ChemistryMaterials scienceThermodynamicsQuantum mechanicsPhysical chemistryMathematicsAqueous solutionMolecule

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work introduces two expressions for the integration of the van der Waals interactions in geometries that are relevant to determining oil solubilization in micelles and the interaction among surfactants in micelles. The first integral applies to the interaction between a sphere and a spherical shell that surrounds the sphere. The second integral calculates the interaction between a truncated cone and the rest of a spherical shell that contains the cone. The new sphere-shell integration method was validated via a comparison between fully predicted and experimental surface tensions of alkanes at room temperature and reproduced the near zero surface tension values that are obtained close to the critical point. The cone-shell integration method was validated, in association with the sphere-shell expression, using a comparison between predicted and experimental cohesive energies for alkanes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Journal of Physical Chemistry BSame topicMaterial Dynamics and PropertiesFrench-language works237,207